Evaluate What Was Reported
Consider psychometric responses, open-ended narratives and relevant digital feedback within the same experience context.
Authenticity Score
Current capability + project-based R&DDo stated experiences align with the surrounding evidence?
Authenticity Score does not label feedback as ‘true’ or ‘false.’ It evaluates response quality, consistency, and available contextual signals to show how much confidence each response warrants.
The Confidence Behind the Score
Not every completed response deserves the same level of confidence.
A respondent may select the same option across every item, complete a questionnaire unusually quickly or describe something in an open-ended answer that appears inconsistent with the structured responses. None of these signals proves that the response is wrong. Authenticity Score evaluates them together to help determine how cautiously—or confidently—the evidence should be interpreted.
The goal is not to judge the person. It is to weight the evidence appropriately.
Mechanism
Connect the signals. Flag inconsistencies. Explain the confidence level.
The base approach uses existing response-quality information. Behavioral or sensor-based signals are considered only in appropriate project or R&D settings with relevant consent and safeguards.
Examine Response Behavior
Evaluate indicators such as completion time, patterned responding, internal consistency, item behavior and textual quality.
Show Evidence Strength
Instead of deleting or silencing feedback, indicate confidence level, relevant inconsistencies and areas requiring closer review.
WHAT WAS REPORTEDSurvey + review
×RESPONSE BEHAVIORTiming + consistency + patterns
×AVAILABLE CONTEXTProject-based contextual signals
=EVIDENCE STRENGTHAuthenticity Score
Scientific and ethical boundary
It is not a lie detector.
Authenticity Score does not claim to diagnose honesty, emotion or intent.
It does not label people.
The system evaluates response-quality indicators—not whether an individual is “honest” or “dishonest.”
It does not draw conclusions from one signal.
Fast responses, facial expression or vocal characteristics alone do not determine an outcome.
Behavioral layers are project-based.
Face, voice or movement signals are not required components of the core score and may only be explored in appropriately designed research or project settings.
Results remain explainable.
Where appropriate, the confidence assessment is accompanied by the categories of evidence contributing to it.